Sandboxer vs Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev runs TypeScript tasks on managed workers (machine presets up to 8 vCPU/16 GB) and bills per second only while tasks execute. It is a task and workflow platform, not an interactive machine. Pick it for durable background jobs; pick Sandboxer for a full VM.
Checked against Trigger.dev's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where Trigger.dev is strong
- Open source (Apache 2.0) and self-hostable.
- Compute is billed only while tasks execute; waits over 5 s are not billed.
- Presets from 0.25 vCPU to 8 vCPU/16 GB.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Trigger.dev tasks are code run on managed workers; Sandboxer provides a whole Ubuntu VM with root.
- Trigger.dev has a 10 GB disk per machine preset; Sandboxer default is 50 GB.
- Docs fetched do not describe pause/resume of machines or public ports.
Pick Trigger.dev if
- You need durable TypeScript background jobs and workflows.
- You want an open-source task platform to self-host.
- You want compute billed only during execution.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You need a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM rather than a container or job runner.
- You want stop to save memory and disk and resume to bring running processes back, with stopped sandboxes costing nothing.
- You want coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and others) preinstalled and driven through a prompt API, with per-second billing.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Trigger.dev is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Trigger.dev.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Aptible
Compliance-focused PaaS that runs Docker apps and managed databases on dedicated or shared stacks.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Fargate
Serverless container runtime for Amazon ECS: you give it a container image and CPU/memory, AWS runs the task.
- Sandboxer vs Azure Container Apps
Serverless container platform with scale-to-zero, per-second billing, jobs, GPUs, and dynamic sessions for sandboxed code.
- Sandboxer vs Clever Cloud
European PaaS that deploys apps and Docker images onto per-instance VMs with autoscaling and per-second billing.
- Sandboxer vs Cloudflare Workers for Platforms
Cloudflare product for platforms to run customer or AI-generated code in isolated Workers on its global network.
- Sandboxer vs Fly.io Machines
Fast-launching VMs from container images, controlled by a REST API, with per-second billing and region choice.
- Sandboxer vs Heroku
Salesforce's long-running PaaS that runs apps in dynos (containers) with add-on data services.
- Sandboxer vs Hugging Face Jobs
Pay-per-second batch compute on Hugging Face infrastructure: run a command in a Docker image on CPU, GPU or TPU hardware.
- Sandboxer vs InsForge
Open-source backend platform for AI-built apps (Postgres, auth, storage, functions) with a managed cloud and long-running compute containers.