Sandboxer vs Fly.io Machines
Fly Machines are VMs that boot from container images and are managed through a REST API or flyctl, billed per second while running. They are a general app and compute primitive, not an agent sandbox product. Pick Fly for deploying apps close to users in many regions; pick Sandboxer for a full-VM workspace with agents preinstalled.
Checked against Fly.io Machines' public docs on October 27, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Fly.io Machines is strong
- Machines start in well under a second from stopped and are created from any container image.
- Per-second billing, with stopped Machines costing only root filesystem storage.
- Region choice per Machine, and GPU configuration through the Machines API.
- Suspend/resume snapshots exist in the API.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Fly Machines are built from container images; a Sandboxer sandbox is a complete Ubuntu 24.04 VM with its own kernel, systemd and Docker preinstalled.
- Fly's suspend resume is described as not guaranteed; Sandboxer stop saves memory and disk and resume brings processes back.
- Fly Machines have no coding agents preinstalled or prompt API; Sandboxer ships six agents and a streamed prompt API.
- Fly offers many regions and GPUs; Sandboxer runs in us-east and eu-central and has no GPUs today.
Pick Fly.io Machines if
- You deploy apps or services across many regions close to users.
- You need GPU Machines or want to build on a low-level machines REST API.
- You already run workloads on Fly and want per-second VM compute.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You need a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM rather than a container or job runner.
- You want stop to save memory and disk and resume to bring running processes back, with stopped sandboxes costing nothing.
- You want coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and others) preinstalled and driven through a prompt API, with per-second billing.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Fly.io Machines is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Fly.io Machines.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Aptible
Compliance-focused PaaS that runs Docker apps and managed databases on dedicated or shared stacks.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Fargate
Serverless container runtime for Amazon ECS: you give it a container image and CPU/memory, AWS runs the task.
- Sandboxer vs Azure Container Apps
Serverless container platform with scale-to-zero, per-second billing, jobs, GPUs, and dynamic sessions for sandboxed code.
- Sandboxer vs Cloudflare Workers for Platforms
Cloudflare product for platforms to run customer or AI-generated code in isolated Workers on its global network.
- Sandboxer vs Heroku
Salesforce's long-running PaaS that runs apps in dynos (containers) with add-on data services.
- Sandboxer vs Hugging Face Jobs
Pay-per-second batch compute on Hugging Face infrastructure: run a command in a Docker image on CPU, GPU or TPU hardware.
- Sandboxer vs InsForge
Open-source backend platform for AI-built apps (Postgres, auth, storage, functions) with a managed cloud and long-running compute containers.
- Sandboxer vs Mastra Cloud
Hosted platform for deploying and observing Mastra AI agents and workflows, built on an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework.
- Sandboxer vs Modelence
Cloud platform that deploys and runs backends, databases and jobs for agent-written apps, plus an open-source framework.