Sandboxer vs Google Agent Platform Sandboxes
Google's Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform offers managed sandboxes for code execution, browser-based computer use, shell and custom containers, with TTLs of 7 to 14 days and idle pause/resume. They use container sandboxing inside Google Cloud governance (VPC Service Controls, CMEK). Pick Google if you are already on Google Cloud and need those controls.
Checked against Google Agent Platform Sandboxes' public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Google Agent Platform Sandboxes is strong
- Computer use and Shell sandboxes reached general availability on September 9, 2026.
- Governance features: VPC Service Controls and customer-managed encryption keys.
- TTLs of up to 14 days with pause and resume of idle sandboxes.
- Bring-your-own custom container images.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Google sandboxes are container-based; Sandboxer provides a full VM with its own kernel.
- Google's pages checked don't document Docker, nested virtualization, per-port public URLs or hourly pricing.
- Google ties sandboxes to Google Cloud projects and the Agent Platform; Sandboxer is a standalone API, CLI and SDKs.
Pick Google Agent Platform Sandboxes if
- You are on Google Cloud and need VPC Service Controls, CMEK or data residency.
- You need an isolated browser for computer-use agents.
Pick Sandboxer if
- Each Sandboxer sandbox is a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with its own kernel, root/sudo, systemd and Docker preinstalled.
- Stopping saves memory and disk and resume brings running processes back; stopped sandboxes cost nothing.
- Coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and others) are preinstalled and driven through a prompt API, with an MCP server, REST API, CLI and TypeScript and Python SDKs.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Google Agent Platform Sandboxes is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Google Agent Platform Sandboxes.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.