Sandboxer vs Declaw
Declaw runs each agent execution in a Firecracker microVM and routes outbound traffic through a security proxy with guardrails, a credential vault and audit logging. Sandboxer is a general full-VM platform. Pick Declaw for built-in egress guardrails and BYOC; pick Sandboxer for a full machine with Docker and nested KVM.
Checked against Declaw's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where Declaw is strong
- Built-in egress security proxy with PII and prompt-injection scanning.
- Self-hosted/BYOC option with Terraform modules.
- Credential vault, persistent volumes and audit logging in one SDK.
- $100 free sandbox credit and $200 guardrail credit, no card required.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Declaw puts a policy proxy with guardrails on every outbound request; Sandboxer gives a full VM with root and Docker.
- Declaw is self-hostable on GCP or AWS; Sandboxer is not self-hostable.
- Root, Docker, nested virtualization, fork and port URLs are not documented on the pages read.
Pick Declaw if
- You need PII redaction and prompt-injection checks on agent egress.
- You need to run the sandbox platform inside your own cloud account.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You want a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM, with Claude Code, Codex and other coding agents preinstalled.
- You want stop to save memory and disk so that resume brings running processes back, with stopped sandboxes costing nothing.
- You want one flat monthly plan whose dollars come back as machine time, with sandboxes that can run with no time limit on a paid plan.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Declaw is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Declaw.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.