Sandboxer vs Tenki Sandbox
Tenki Sandbox gives agents full Linux VMs with their own kernel, root, Docker, pause that keeps memory, and forking from checkpoints. It is the closest in design to Sandboxer; differences are pricing structure, size caps by plan, and Sandboxer's preinstalled coding agents and nested KVM. Pick Tenki for larger VMs on its Team plan; pick Sandboxer for flat plans and preinstalled agents.
Checked against Tenki Sandbox's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where Tenki Sandbox is strong
- Full Linux VM with root and Docker, and pause that preserves memory.
- Fork sessions from a disk-and-memory checkpoint.
- Per-second billing with Team VMs up to 16 cores and 64 GB RAM.
- TypeScript, Go and Python SDKs and a CLI.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Tenki Starter VMs top out at 4 cores and 8 GB and 5 active sessions; Team allows 16 cores, 64 GB and 100 sessions at $200 to $250 a month.
- Tenki bills CPU, memory and disk as separate usage rates after credits; Sandboxer plans return every plan dollar as machine time.
- Sandboxer ships coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and more) in every sandbox with a prompt API; Tenki lets you bring your own agent.
- Nested virtualization is not documented for Tenki; Sandboxer provides /dev/kvm.
Pick Tenki Sandbox if
- You need VMs larger than 16 vCPU / 32 GB (Tenki Team goes to 16 cores and 64 GB).
- You want a plan with up to 100 concurrent sessions at a flat monthly fee plus usage.
- You want to bring your own agent via SDK or CLI.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You want coding agents preinstalled and driven through a prompt API.
- You need nested KVM and systemd in a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM.
- You want plans that convert every dollar into machine time and a 7-day trial.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Tenki Sandbox is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Tenki Sandbox.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.