Sandboxer vs shellbox
shellbox gives on-demand Linux microVMs over plain SSH; your key fingerprint is your account, and idle boxes pause with memory. Sandboxer offers a REST API, SDKs and bundled coding agents. Pick shellbox for a minimal SSH workflow; pick Sandboxer for APIs, agents and larger sizes.
Checked against shellbox's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where shellbox is strong
- No signup: the SSH key fingerprint is the account.
- Root, Docker and nested KVM (with --ch) are documented.
- Memory-snapshot pause and resume in about 3 seconds.
- Pricing is simple per slot and refundable within three months for unused funds.
Where Sandboxer differs
- shellbox is SSH-first with a small API surface; Sandboxer adds a REST API, OpenAPI, SDKs and an MCP server.
- shellbox exposes one HTTPS port per box; Sandboxer gives any port as an HTTPS URL.
- shellbox caps accounts at 16 running slots; Sandboxer plans set concurrency up to 2000.
Pick shellbox if
- You want no account setup and a plain SSH workflow.
- You want the option of Cloud Hypervisor with /dev/kvm at a low slot price.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You want a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM, with Claude Code, Codex and other coding agents preinstalled.
- You want stop to save memory and disk so that resume brings running processes back, with stopped sandboxes costing nothing.
- You want one flat monthly plan whose dollars come back as machine time, with sandboxes that can run with no time limit on a paid plan.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. shellbox is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with shellbox.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.