Sandboxer vs Koyeb Sandboxes
Koyeb offers Sandboxes as ephemeral compute for isolated code execution inside its broader serverless platform, available on Starter, Pro and Scale plans. It differs from Sandboxer by being one feature of an app platform with GPUs and multiple regions. Pick Koyeb if you already run on its platform or need GPUs; pick Sandboxer for persistent full VMs.
Checked against Koyeb Sandboxes' public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Koyeb Sandboxes is strong
- Sandboxes sit alongside a full serverless platform.
- GPU instances available on the platform.
- Per-second billing and multiple regions.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Koyeb sandboxes are described as ephemeral; Sandboxer sandboxes can stop and resume with memory.
- Koyeb's sandbox pages do not state root, Docker, nested virtualization or snapshots.
- Koyeb Sandboxes are available on the Starter, Pro and Scale plans of the Koyeb platform.
Pick Koyeb Sandboxes if
- You need GPUs or serverless services next to your sandboxes.
- You want a choice of multiple regions.
- You already deploy on Koyeb.
Pick Sandboxer if
- Your workload needs a full Ubuntu VM with systemd, Docker preinstalled and nested KVM.
- You want coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Pi, Kimi Code, Mistral Vibe) preinstalled and driven through a prompt API.
- You want stop/resume that keeps memory and running processes, with sessions that can run with no time limit on a paid plan.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Koyeb Sandboxes is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Koyeb Sandboxes.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.