Sandboxer vs InstaVM
InstaVM is a cloud platform for AI agents that runs code in microVMs with their own kernel with snapshots, forking, share URLs for any port, egress policy controls and per-second billing. It is closest to Sandboxer in model; it advertises a free tier with credits and a $100/month Pro plan. Pick InstaVM for its free credits, egress allowlists and browser/desktop sessions; pick Sandboxer for a full Ubuntu VM with Docker, nested KVM and preinstalled coding agents.
Checked against InstaVM's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where InstaVM is strong
- Pause, snapshot, resume and fork of VMs, with restores typically under 500 ms.
- Share URLs for any port, public or token-private, plus custom domains.
- Egress allowlists by domain or CIDR on Pro, and agents are kept away from API keys.
- Free tier with starting credits and no card required.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Free and Pro tiers cap concurrency at 5 and 100; Sandboxer's plans scale from 100 to 2000.
- InstaVM's plans list Python, JS and Bash as supported languages and its pages do not state Docker or nested KVM support; Sandboxer is a full Ubuntu VM with Docker and nested KVM.
- Pro costs $100/month plus usage; Sandboxer's plan dollars come back as machine time.
- Sandboxer ships coding agents preinstalled and an MCP server.
Pick InstaVM if
- You want a free tier with starting credits and no card.
- You need egress allowlists and want API keys kept away from agents.
- You want browser and desktop sessions alongside VMs.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You want a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with Docker, systemd and nested KVM.
- You want coding agents preinstalled and driven through a prompt API.
- You want plans where every dollar returns as machine time and unlimited run length on paid plans.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. InstaVM is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with InstaVM.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.