Sandboxer vs Freestyle
Freestyle offers real Linux VMs with full root, live forking, pause/resume that preserves memory, SSH and systemd, plus HTTPS domains routed to guest ports. It is a close peer to Sandboxer, with plans from free to $500/month and a 99.99% SLA on Enterprise. Pick Freestyle for live forking and its SLA tier; pick Sandboxer for nested KVM, a prompt API for its coding agents and plan dollars returned as machine time.
Checked against Freestyle's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where Freestyle is strong
- Live forking and pause/resume that preserves memory.
- SSH, systemd and HTTPS domains routed to guest ports.
- Free tier plus Hobby ($50) and Pro ($500) plans, with an Enterprise 99.99% SLA.
- Ubuntu base snapshots ship Docker and coding agents (claude, codex, opencode, openclaw).
Where Sandboxer differs
- Persistent VMs and custom sizing require Hobby or Pro; Free is non-persistent.
- Max VM size is 4 vCPU/8 GiB on Free, 8/16 on Hobby, 32/64 on Pro.
- Nested KVM is not documented by Freestyle; Sandboxer provides /dev/kvm in every sandbox.
Pick Freestyle if
- You need an enterprise SLA and SAML/SCIM.
- You want live forking with VM-level SSH and domain routing.
- You need larger VMs up to 32 vCPU / 64 GiB.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You need nested KVM (/dev/kvm) inside the VM.
- You want coding agents driven through a prompt API with streamed events and an MCP server.
- You want plan dollars to return as machine time and per-second billing.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Freestyle is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Freestyle.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.