Sandboxer vs Expo EAS Build
EAS Build is Expo's hosted service that builds Android and iOS apps, each on a dedicated VM, billed as a flat price per build after plan credit. Sandboxer is a general-purpose sandbox, not a mobile build service. Pick EAS for Expo and React Native builds; pick Sandboxer for agent and dev environments.
Checked against Expo EAS Build's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Expo EAS Build is strong
- Builds iOS apps on Mac mini hosts, each build on its own fresh macOS VM.
- Flat per-build pricing that is easy to predict.
- Integrated with Expo tooling for submit and updates.
- Medium 4 vCPU / 16 GB and large 8 vCPU / 32 GB Android workers.
Where Sandboxer differs
- EAS builds are one-shot jobs with a 45-minute to 2-hour timeout; Sandboxer sandboxes persist and can run with no time limit on a paid plan.
- EAS bills per build; Sandboxer bills per second of machine time.
- EAS provides macOS builders; Sandboxer has no macOS VMs.
Pick Expo EAS Build if
- You ship an Expo or React Native app and need iOS builds and store submission.
- You want flat per-build pricing and submission to the app stores included on every plan.
Pick Sandboxer if
- Need a long-lived machine you can stop, resume and reach over SSH or an HTTPS URL, not a machine that exists for one job.
- Want coding agents preinstalled and a prompt API, MCP server, SDKs and CLI for driving them.
- Need Docker, nested KVM and full root in a VM that can stop with memory saved and resume with processes running.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Expo EAS Build is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Expo EAS Build.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs AWS CodeBuild
Managed continuous-integration build service from AWS that runs build commands on on-demand or reserved compute.
- Sandboxer vs Azure Pipelines
Microsoft's CI/CD service that runs jobs on Microsoft-hosted agents (fresh VM per job) or your own self-hosted agents.
- Sandboxer vs Bitbucket Pipelines
Atlassian's CI/CD built into Bitbucket Cloud; steps run in Docker images with size multipliers.
- Sandboxer vs Bitrise
Mobile-focused CI/CD service with hosted macOS and Linux build machines, plus Build Hub runners for GitHub Actions.
- Sandboxer vs Blacksmith
Drop-in GitHub Actions runners on Firecracker microVMs, with caching and Docker build acceleration.
- Sandboxer vs Buildkite hosted agents
Buildkite's managed CI agents on Linux, macOS and Windows, billed per vCPU-minute, alongside self-hosted agents.
- Sandboxer vs CircleCI
Hosted CI/CD with Docker, Linux VM, macOS, Windows and GPU resource classes billed in credits.
- Sandboxer vs Codemagic
CI/CD for mobile and Flutter apps on macOS and Linux machines, billed per minute or annually.
- Sandboxer vs Depot
Fast container builds and GitHub Actions runners on ephemeral AWS instances, with a newer sandbox product.