Sandboxer vs Buildkite hosted agents
Buildkite hosted agents are managed, ephemeral build machines for Buildkite Pipelines, with Linux, macOS and Windows shapes billed per vCPU-minute. Sandboxer is not a CI system: its sandboxes persist and can pause with memory saved. Pick Buildkite for pipelines you orchestrate at scale; pick Sandboxer for interactive and agent environments.
Checked against Buildkite hosted agents' public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where Buildkite hosted agents is strong
- Per-second billing with no minimum, on published per-vCPU rates.
- Self-hosted agents are a first-class option alongside hosted ones.
- Cache volumes on local NVMe persist between jobs at no extra charge.
- Linux, macOS (M4) and Windows hosted agents.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Buildkite hosted agents are destroyed after each job (up to 8 hours); Sandboxer sandboxes can stop and resume with processes intact.
- Hosted agents run in US East only; Sandboxer runs in us-east and eu-central.
Pick Buildkite hosted agents if
- You orchestrate CI pipelines at scale and want hybrid hosted and self-hosted agents.
- You need macOS or Windows build agents.
- You want an established CI vendor with an SLA on Enterprise.
Pick Sandboxer if
- Need a long-lived machine you can stop, resume and reach over SSH or an HTTPS URL, not a machine that exists for one job.
- Want coding agents preinstalled and a prompt API, MCP server, SDKs and CLI for driving them.
- Need Docker, nested KVM and full root in a VM that can stop with memory saved and resume with processes running.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Buildkite hosted agents is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Buildkite hosted agents.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Blacksmith
Drop-in GitHub Actions runners on Firecracker microVMs, with caching and Docker build acceleration.
- Sandboxer vs CircleCI
Hosted CI/CD with Docker, Linux VM, macOS, Windows and GPU resource classes billed in credits.
- Sandboxer vs Depot
Fast container builds and GitHub Actions runners on ephemeral AWS instances, with a newer sandbox product.
- Sandboxer vs GitHub Actions hosted runners
GitHub-managed virtual machines that run Actions workflow jobs, with larger and GPU runners on paid plans.
- Sandboxer vs GitLab.com hosted runners
GitLab-managed runners for GitLab.com pipelines on Linux (Windows and macOS in beta), metered in compute minutes.
- Sandboxer vs WarpBuild
Drop-in GitHub Actions runners on cloud VMs, plus Docker builders and bring-your-own-cloud.