Sandboxer vs Deno Sandbox
Deno Sandbox runs code in Linux microVMs that start in under 200 ms and live up to 30 minutes per session, controlled via JavaScript or Python SDKs. Sandboxer instead gives a long-lived full Ubuntu VM with Docker and resumable processes. Pick Deno for fast, short, code-run jobs inside the Deno Deploy ecosystem.
Checked against Deno Sandbox's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Deno Sandbox is strong
- Sandboxes start in under 200 ms according to Deno's FAQ.
- JavaScript, Python and REST interfaces, with durable Volumes and filesystem snapshots.
- Tight integration with Deno Deploy, including promoting a sandbox to a Deploy app.
- Per-sandbox egress control with allowNet.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Deno sessions are capped at 30 minutes (extendable); Sandboxer paid plans can run with no time limit.
- Deno Sandbox gives 2 vCPU and 768 MB to 4 GiB of memory; Sandboxer sizes go up to 16 vCPU / 32 GB (xlarge, on the $100 plan or higher).
- Deno documents filesystem-only snapshots; Sandboxer stop/resume keeps running processes.
- Deno has two regions (ams, ord); Sandboxer runs in us-east and eu-central.
Pick Deno Sandbox if
- You run short code-execution jobs and want sub-second startup from a JS or Python SDK.
- You already deploy on Deno Deploy and want to promote a sandbox to an app.
- You want a small usage-based bill with a $20 plan.
Pick Sandboxer if
- Each Sandboxer sandbox is a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with its own kernel, root/sudo, systemd and Docker preinstalled.
- Stopping saves memory and disk and resume brings running processes back; stopped sandboxes cost nothing.
- Coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and others) are preinstalled and driven through a prompt API, with an MCP server, REST API, CLI and TypeScript and Python SDKs.
Sources
- Deno Sandbox docs
- Deno Sandbox page and pricing
- Deno Deploy pricing
- Deno Sandbox timeouts
- Deno Sandbox volumes and snapshots
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Deno Sandbox is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Deno Sandbox.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.