Sandboxer vs Coasty
Coasty is a computer-use API: submit a goal to POST /v1/tasks and its agent drives a managed Linux or Windows machine, or your own enrolled device. It differs from Sandboxer by focusing on GUI task automation rather than a general-purpose developer VM. Pick Coasty for desktop and Windows computer-use tasks; pick Sandboxer for full Ubuntu VMs with SSH, Docker and coding agents.
Checked against Coasty's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Coasty is strong
- Windows and Linux machines with a desktop GUI option.
- Enrol your own device as a machine.
- Task API that runs an agent from a single goal, plus workflows and schedules.
- Low flat hourly rate for running machines, with an OpenAPI schema.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Built for GUI computer-use tasks, not as a developer VM with SSH, Docker and nested KVM.
- Hourly rate appears flat per machine state; the docs read do not tie it to CPU/RAM size.
- TTL maximum 7 days per machine; Sandboxer paid plans allow no time limit.
- Sandboxer has coding agents, MCP server and CLI/SDKs rather than a computer-use agent.
Pick Coasty if
- You need a computer-use agent for desktop or Windows software.
- You want to drive your own device through the same API.
- You want a managed task API rather than raw VMs.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You want a full Ubuntu VM with root, Docker, systemd and SSH.
- You want coding agents driven via a prompt API and MCP server.
- You want any port as an HTTPS URL and stopped machines free.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Coasty is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Coasty.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.