Sandboxer vs Cloudflare Sandbox
Cloudflare Sandbox SDK runs isolated Linux environments on Cloudflare Containers, controlled from Workers code and Durable Objects. It differs from Sandboxer in its edge-platform integration and in that files are deleted when the container stops. Pick Cloudflare if your app already runs on Workers; pick Sandboxer for persistent full VMs.
Checked against Cloudflare Sandbox's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where Cloudflare Sandbox is strong
- Tight integration with Workers, Durable Objects and the Cloudflare network.
- Billing at 10 ms granularity, CPU only when active.
- Instances scale to idle after inactivity.
- Paid Workers plan includes some monthly usage.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Sandbox state is lost when the container stops, while Sandboxer saves memory and disk on stop.
- Cloudflare sandboxes are controlled through a Worker; Sandboxer is a standalone VM with SSH and REST.
- Cloudflare's own pages do not state root, Docker or nested virtualization.
Pick Cloudflare Sandbox if
- Your application already runs on Cloudflare Workers.
- You want short-lived, event-driven sandboxes billed in 10 ms steps.
- You want to stay on a single vendor for edge, storage and compute.
Pick Sandboxer if
- Your workload needs a full Ubuntu VM with systemd, Docker preinstalled and nested KVM.
- You want coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Pi, Kimi Code, Mistral Vibe) preinstalled and driven through a prompt API.
- You want stop/resume that keeps memory and running processes, with sessions that can run with no time limit on a paid plan.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Cloudflare Sandbox is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Cloudflare Sandbox.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.