Sandboxer vs Celesto Cloud
Celesto Cloud hosts microVM sandboxes built on the Apache-2.0 SmolVM core, so you can run the same runtime yourself. Sizes use shared vCPUs from $0.015/h. Sandboxer is closed-source with root, Docker and nested KVM. Pick Celesto for open source and self-hosting; pick Sandboxer for a full VM with bundled agents.
Checked against Celesto Cloud's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Celesto Cloud is strong
- Open-source Apache-2.0 core that you can self-host.
- Low entry price: $0.015/h for 1 shared vCPU / 2 GB.
- No subscription or monthly minimum.
- Fork and suspend/resume are advertised.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Celesto vCPUs are listed as shared and top out at 8; Sandboxer sizes range from 2 to 16 vCPU VMs.
- Celesto can be self-hosted; Sandboxer cannot.
- Root, Docker, nested virtualization, session limits and regions are not stated on the pages read.
Pick Celesto Cloud if
- You want an open-source runtime you can self-host or audit.
- You want the cheapest small sandboxes for light tasks.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You want a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM, with Claude Code, Codex and other coding agents preinstalled.
- You want stop to save memory and disk so that resume brings running processes back, with stopped sandboxes costing nothing.
- You want one flat monthly plan whose dollars come back as machine time, with sandboxes that can run with no time limit on a paid plan.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Celesto Cloud is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Celesto Cloud.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.