Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 is a managed service for hosting agent harnesses in persistent sandboxes, with standard sandboxes under gVisor and full VMs with their own kernel. It differs from Sandboxer in its low metered pricing and bundled model access, while Sandboxer focuses on full VMs with nested KVM and memory-preserving stop. Pick Agent37 for cheap always-on agent hosting; pick Sandboxer for heavier VM workloads.
Checked against Agent37's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where Agent37 is strong
- Very low metered compute prices.
- Sandboxes persist files across sleep and restarts with automatic backups.
- Choice of gVisor sandboxes or full VMs with own kernel.
- SOC 2 Type I, with Type II in progress.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Standard Agent37 sandboxes use gVisor on shared hosts rather than a dedicated microVM kernel.
- Agent37 bundles model access and integrations; Sandboxer provides preinstalled coding agents and a prompt API.
- Agent37 offers /dev/kvm only on its VM instance type and does not state GPU support; every Sandboxer sandbox is a VM with nested KVM.
Pick Agent37 if
- Cost is the main constraint and you want always-on agent hosting.
- You want managed model access and app integrations bundled.
- You want a white-label API for per-user agents.
- You need a region in the EU (France) or India (Mumbai).
Pick Sandboxer if
- You want every sandbox to be a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM by default, not a gVisor sandbox.
- You want coding agents preinstalled in every sandbox and driven through a prompt API with streamed events.
- You want a fixed per-size hourly price (default 4 vCPU/8 GB at $0.036/h) with plan dollars returned as machine time.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Agent37 is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Agent37.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.
- Sandboxer vs Azure Container Apps dynamic sessions
Azure service of prewarmed, Hyper-V-isolated sessions for running untrusted or AI-generated code, via code interpreter or custom containers.