Sandboxer vs Runtime
Runtime (withruntime) offers Firecracker microVM sandboxes that auto-pause after idle while keeping memory and processes, with fork, snapshots, previews and Docker after one command. It differs from Sandboxer in active-CPU billing and open-source SDKs, while Sandboxer ships a full Ubuntu VM with preinstalled agents and nested KVM. Pick Runtime for low metered cost and fork-with-memory; pick Sandboxer for agent tooling and a persistent full VM.
Checked against Runtime's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where Runtime is strong
- Fork copies running sandboxes including memory and processes.
- Active-CPU billing and free paused compute.
- Open-source SDKs, CLI and MCP server.
- Compatibility entry points for E2B, Daytona and Vercel SDKs.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Runtime bills only active vCPU while Sandboxer prices fixed sizes by the hour.
- Runtime forks carry running processes; Sandboxer forks boot fresh from the disk snapshot.
- Runtime docs do not state nested virtualization, GPUs or a region list.
Pick Runtime if
- You want fork that keeps running processes.
- You are migrating from E2B, Daytona or Vercel SDKs.
- You want billing based on CPU actually used.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You need a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM rather than a bare sandbox runtime.
- You want coding agents preinstalled in every sandbox and driven through a prompt API with streamed events.
- You want a fixed per-size hourly price (default 4 vCPU/8 GB at $0.036/h) with plan dollars returned as machine time.
Sources
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Runtime is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Runtime.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.