Sandboxer vs Ona
Ona provisions each environment as an isolated VM from a Dev Container config, either on Ona Cloud or in your AWS or GCP VPC. Its docs say new customer signup is closed, and new Core subscriptions are unavailable. Pick Ona for enterprise VPC deployment; pick Sandboxer for a self-serve sandbox you can start today. Ona's site describes it as part of OpenAI.
Checked against Ona's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Ona is strong
- Runners can run in your own VPC with network control, or on Ona Cloud.
- Dev Container based prebuilds start environments in seconds.
- Environments are defined as code with Dev Containers.
- Admin controls include org-wide command deny lists and a kernel-level executable control (Veto).
Where Sandboxer differs
- Ona docs say new customer signup is closed; Sandboxer is self-serve.
- Ona environments are ephemeral by design; Sandboxer stop keeps memory and processes.
- Ona has VPC runners; Sandboxer is a single hosted region.
- Pricing is in OCUs, not machine-seconds.
Pick Ona if
- You need runners inside your own AWS or GCP VPC.
- You want org-wide guardrails and Dev Container standardisation.
- You already are an Ona customer.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You need a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM, with agents like Claude Code and Codex preinstalled.
- You want stop to save memory and disk and resume to bring processes back, with stopped sandboxes costing nothing.
- You want a REST API, CLI, TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server on per-second billing.
Sources
- Ona home
- Ona docs: how Ona works
- Ona docs: billing overview
- Ona pricing
- Ona docs
- Ona docs: usage and OCUs
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Ona is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Ona.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs boxes.dev
A fresh Linux cloud computer (devbox) per coding agent, with templates, sleep, preview URLs and hour-based plans.
- Sandboxer vs Capy
A cloud coding-agent product: threads run on Firecracker VMs that open pull requests, with a desktop app for local runs.
- Sandboxer vs Cube Computer
A persistent cloud Linux machine for coding agents, used through a Mac app, browser or phone, billed by the minute from prepaid credit.
- Sandboxer vs Datalayer
AI platform for data analysis: managed Jupyter-based runtimes (CPU or GPU) and notebooks that agents and people drive via MCP, SDK and CLI.
- Sandboxer vs exe.dev
Persistent Linux VMs with HTTPS and SSH, sold as a shared CPU/RAM pool, plus disposable VM sandboxes for agents.
- Sandboxer vs GitHub Codespaces
GitHub's cloud dev environments: a dev container on a VM, opened in VS Code or the browser from a repository.
- Sandboxer vs Lightning AI Studios
Persistent cloud workspaces for AI development with switchable CPU and GPU machines, auto sleep and duplication.
- Sandboxer vs Namespace Devboxes
Remote Linux and macOS machines for agents and developers, with persistent storage, SSH, and shareable authenticated URLs.
- Sandboxer vs Prized
Dedicated cloud Linux boxes that sync with your laptop, plus short-lived Firecracker microVM sandboxes (beta) created through an API.