Sandboxer vs Kedge
Kedge is a cloud platform for hosting sites, apps and databases that also offers sandboxes, dev machines and persistent agent workspaces, all in hardware-isolated VMs. Its sandboxes expire after minutes to an hour and have no ingress, whereas Sandboxer sandboxes are persistent full VMs with public URLs per port. Pick Kedge to host apps across ten regions alongside its dev machines; pick Sandboxer for long-lived agent VMs with any port exposed.
Checked against Kedge's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Where Kedge is strong
- Ten compute regions across Europe, the Americas, Asia, Africa and Oceania.
- One platform for apps, databases, handlers, CI runners, dev machines and sandboxes.
- Cold restore of idle apps from a snapshot at a 33 ms fleet median, per Kedge's homepage.
- Every instance, handler, sandbox and CI job runs in a hardware-isolated VM with its own kernel.
Where Sandboxer differs
- Kedge sandboxes expire after 5 idle minutes or at most 1 hour and cannot take inbound traffic; Sandboxer sandboxes can run with no time limit on a paid plan and expose any port.
- Kedge is an app-hosting platform first; Sandboxer is built around agent sandboxes with coding agents preinstalled.
- Kedge's published prices are estimates for a future paid service during a public preview.
- Kedge docs do not mention root, Docker or nested virtualization inside sandboxes.
Pick Kedge if
- You want to host web apps, databases and handlers in many regions.
- You need short, disposable eval sandboxes spread across a global fleet.
- You want agents and dev machines on the same platform as your deployed app.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You need machines that persist for hours or days and keep processes across stop and resume.
- You need to reach a service inside the sandbox over HTTPS.
- You need Docker, systemd and nested KVM in a full Ubuntu VM.
Sources
- Kedge
- Kedge docs: sandboxes
- Kedge docs: security and isolation
- Kedge docs: global coverage
- Kedge docs: pricing and billing
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. Kedge is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with Kedge.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs Agent37
Agent37 hosts persistent sandboxes for agent harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex and OpenClaw, priced per minute.
- Sandboxer vs AgentComputer
Cloud computers for AI agents running in Firecracker instances, with snapshots and published ports.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud Agent Sandbox (AgentRun)
Alibaba Cloud's E2B-compatible VM-isolated agent sandbox (Flash and Container editions) billed per second per vCPU/GiB.
- Sandboxer vs Alibaba Cloud AgentBay
Alibaba Cloud's on-demand cloud sandboxes for AI agents: Linux and Windows computers, browsers, code sandboxes and Android phones.
- Sandboxer vs Amika
Open-source tool for running isolated coding-agent VMs on your own machines, your cloud accounts, or Amika-hosted devboxes.
- Sandboxer vs Amp Orbs
Remote Debian machines where the Amp coding agent works on a thread, pausing when idle and waking with files and processes intact.
- Sandboxer vs Archil
Serverless runtime and persistent Firecracker sandboxes for agents, built on Archil's shared disks and object-storage filesystems.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore (Code Interpreter / Runtime)
Managed AWS services for agents: Runtime hosts agents in per-session microVMs, Code Interpreter runs code in a sandbox.
- Sandboxer vs AWS Lambda MicroVMs
AWS Firecracker-based MicroVMs for sandboxes, suspend/resume with memory and disk preserved, built from a Dockerfile image.