Sandboxer vs exe.dev
exe.dev gives you a pool of vCPU and memory that your root-access VMs share, with HTTPS and SSH to each. Sandboxer meters each sandbox per second and adds memory-preserving stop/resume and bundled coding agents. Pick exe.dev for many small persistent VMs on a flat plan or for non-US regions; pick Sandboxer for agent-driven, pausable full-VM sandboxes.
Checked against exe.dev's public docs on October 24, 2026. Sources are linked in the table and listed below.
At a glance
= not documented publicly.
Price for one 4 vCPU, 8 GB machine
List prices from each provider's pricing page, before free credits, plans and storage. This compares price only.
Where exe.dev is strong
- Resources are a shared pool, so many small VMs do not each need their own sizing.
- Nine regions across the US, Europe, Asia and Australia.
- VMs are persistent, reachable with SSH as root and with HTTPS URLs by default.
- Docker works with no special setup.
Where Sandboxer differs
- exe.dev bills a monthly pool (from about $15 for personal plans) while Sandboxer bills each sandbox per second.
- Only one forwarded port can be public at a time on exe.dev; Sandboxer serves any port as an HTTPS URL, private with a token or public.
- exe.dev docs do not describe memory-preserving pause or nested KVM.
- Sandboxer ships coding agents preinstalled and a prompt API; exe.dev has its own web agent, Shelley.
Pick exe.dev if
- You want a flat monthly pool shared by many persistent VMs.
- You need a region outside the US, such as Frankfurt, Tokyo, Sydney, Singapore or London.
- You want a team plan (Work, from $75 a month) with pooled capacity for many VMs.
Pick Sandboxer if
- You need a full Ubuntu 24.04 VM with root, systemd, Docker and nested KVM, with agents like Claude Code and Codex preinstalled.
- You want stop to save memory and disk and resume to bring processes back, with stopped sandboxes costing nothing.
- You want a REST API, CLI, TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server on per-second billing.
Sources
- exe.dev home
- exe.dev docs: architecture
- exe.dev docs: billing overview
- exe.dev docs: Docker FAQ
- exe.dev docs: HTTP proxies
- exe.dev docs: regions
- exe.dev docs
Products change. If something here is out of date, email hello@sandboxer.com and we'll fix it. exe.dev is a trademark of its owner. Sandboxer is an independent product and is not affiliated with exe.dev.
Other comparisons
Firecracker microVMs with memory-preserving pause and fork, and an open-source stack.
Many sandbox classes, from containers to VMs, Windows and GPUs.
Massive scale and GPUs for short-lived sandboxes, gVisor by default.
Firecracker microVMs billed on active CPU, inside the Vercel platform.
- Sandboxer vs boxes.dev
A fresh Linux cloud computer (devbox) per coding agent, with templates, sleep, preview URLs and hour-based plans.
- Sandboxer vs Capy
A cloud coding-agent product: threads run on Firecracker VMs that open pull requests, with a desktop app for local runs.
- Sandboxer vs Cube Computer
A persistent cloud Linux machine for coding agents, used through a Mac app, browser or phone, billed by the minute from prepaid credit.
- Sandboxer vs Datalayer
AI platform for data analysis: managed Jupyter-based runtimes (CPU or GPU) and notebooks that agents and people drive via MCP, SDK and CLI.
- Sandboxer vs GitHub Codespaces
GitHub's cloud dev environments: a dev container on a VM, opened in VS Code or the browser from a repository.
- Sandboxer vs Lightning AI Studios
Persistent cloud workspaces for AI development with switchable CPU and GPU machines, auto sleep and duplication.
- Sandboxer vs Namespace Devboxes
Remote Linux and macOS machines for agents and developers, with persistent storage, SSH, and shareable authenticated URLs.
- Sandboxer vs Ona
Ephemeral VM-based cloud development environments for developers and coding agents, run on Ona Cloud or in your own VPC.
- Sandboxer vs Prized
Dedicated cloud Linux boxes that sync with your laptop, plus short-lived Firecracker microVM sandboxes (beta) created through an API.